Object history: who moved what, when

Why history in operations is more than “logging”

In warehousing and production, many actions are not “formal” enough to be represented cleanly in classic systems. There are ad‑hoc transfers, temporary drop spots, fast handovers. When something becomes unclear later, teams get slowed down by follow-up questions. A good object history reduces that friction without making daily work heavier.

The important point: history should not just collect events. It must be understandable: date, time, user, old and new assignment. Optional notes help when context is required. And it must fit the object: a tool needs different details than a load carrier or a vehicle.

Typical situations where history saves time

History is especially helpful in these situations: shift handovers (“what is open?”), complaints (“when was that part where?”), internal clarification (“who changed the status?”), or recurring deviations (“why is this location constantly used incorrectly?”).

Notes are not “nice to have”. They often replace informal communication that would otherwise get lost: “Pallet blocked for QC”, “tool at service provider”, “material only partially booked in”. If that information stays with the object, it does not have to be searched in chats or emails.

History needs structure: locations must be unambiguous

A history is only as good as the locations it references. If “Rack 3” has multiple meanings or locations are captured as free text, analysis becomes unreliable. That is why visually modeling areas, zones, and locations is a practical advantage: a place is unambiguous and the history stays interpretable.

Related pages

• Asset tracking – search, find, move
• Warehouse management – locations and occupancy
• Excel alternative – without file versions
• On‑premise – operate inside the company network